Saturday, April 25, 2009

An Homage to Norm McDonald - The 2009 Utah Legislative Session

Comedian Norm Macdonald, when he anchored Saturday Night Live's "Weekend Update," had a bit where he would report on a story such as this one (from a transcript of a 1994 SNL episode):
"A new study says that people who quit smoking have healthier lungs. Yet another groundbreaking story from the pages of the medical journal, "DUH" ... [Image of the October 1994 cover of DUH which features a photo of a doctor and lists a few articles: EXERCISE IS GOOD, MEDICINE CAN HELP, SMOKING IS BAD, EAT RIGHT FOR BETTER HEALTH and CANCER CAN CAUSE DEATH -- cheers and applause]"

In homage to Norm McDonald, I report the following story from the 2009 Utah Legislative Session:

The Utah Legislature amended Subsection (5) of § 30-3-11.3 (pertaining to the Mandatory educational course for divorcing parents) to include the following new provision, "(5)(b) The [mandatory educational course for divorcing parents] shall instruct both parties that domestic violence has a harmful effect on children and family relationships."
(emphasis mine)

Aren't you glad to see the Legislature is doing its part to educate divorcing parents as to the painfully obvious?

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Is There No Alternative to Automatic Income Withholding by ORS to Collect Child Support (you know I wouldn't ask unless the answer is "No.")?

ORS is not inescapably bound to withhold or to attempt to withhold income to ensure the payment of child support.

When a child support order is issued the obligor's income is subject to immediate income withholding for the child support described in the order, unless the court or administrative body which entered the order finds that one of the parties has demonstrated good cause so as not to require immediate income withholding.

In determining "good cause," the court or administrative body may, in addition to any other requirement it considers appropriate, consider whether the obligor has: (a) obtained a bond, deposited money in trust for the benefit of the dependent children, or otherwise made arrangements sufficient to guarantee child support payments for at least two months; (b) arranged to deposit all child support payments into a checking account belonging to the obligee, or made arrangements insuring that a reliable and independent record of the date and place of child support payments will be maintained; or (c) arranged for electronic transfer of funds on a regular basis to meet court-ordered child support obligations (See 62A-11-403. Provision for income withholding in child support order -- Immediate income withholding)).

There are clearly times when income withholding is unnecessary, otherwise Utah Code §§ 62A-11-403 and 62A-11-502 would not exist.

It is both unfair and illegal of ORS to insist on pursuing income withholding without consideration for Utah Code §§ 62A-11-403 and 62A-11-502, and for whether the circumstances exist for a good cause exception.
62A-11-403. Provision for income withholding in child support order -- Immediate income withholding.

(1) Whenever a child support order is issued or modified in this state the obligor's income is subject to immediate income withholding for the child support described in the order in accordance with the provisions of this chapter, unless:
(a) the court or administrative body which entered the order finds that one of the parties has demonstrated good cause so as not to require immediate income withholding; or
(b) a written agreement which provides an alternative payment arrangement is executed by the obligor and obligee, and reviewed and entered in the record by the court or administrative body.
(2) In every child support order issued or modified on or after January 1, 1994, the court or administrative body shall include a provision that the income of an obligor is subject to immediate income withholding in accordance with this chapter. If for any reason other than the provisions of Subsection (1) that provision is not included in the child support order the obligor's income is nevertheless subject to immediate income withholding.
(3) In determining "good cause," the court or administrative body may, in addition to any other requirement it considers appropriate, consider whether the obligor has:
(a) obtained a bond, deposited money in trust for the benefit of the dependent children, or otherwise made arrangements sufficient to guarantee child support payments for at least two months;
(b) arranged to deposit all child support payments into a checking account belonging to the obligee, or made arrangements insuring that a reliable and independent record of the date and place of child support payments will be maintained; or
(c) arranged for electronic transfer of funds on a regular basis to meet court-ordered child support obligations.

62A-11-502. Child support orders issued or modified on or after January 1, 1994 -- Immediate income withholding.

(1) With regard to obligees or obligors who are not receiving IV-D services, each child support order issued or modified on or after January 1, 1994, subjects the income of an obligor to immediate income withholding as of the effective date of the order, regardless of whether a delinquency occurs unless:
(a) the court or administrative body that entered the order finds that one of the parties has demonstrated good cause so as not to require immediate income withholding; or
(b) a written agreement which provides an alternative payment arrangement is executed by the obligor and obligee, and reviewed and entered in the record by the court or administrative body.
(2) For purposes of this section:
(a) an action on or after January 1, 1994, to reduce child support arrears to judgment, without a corresponding establishment of or modification to a base child support amount, is not sufficient to trigger immediate income withholding;
(b) "good cause" shall be based on, at a minimum:
(i) a determination and explanation on the record by the court or administrative body that implementation of income withholding would not be in the best interest of the child; and
(ii) proof of timely payment of any previously ordered support;
(c) in determining "good cause," the court or administrative body may, in addition to any other requirement it considers appropriate, consider whether the obligor has:
(i) obtained a bond, deposited money in trust for the benefit of the dependent children, or otherwise made arrangements sufficient to guarantee child support payments for at least two months;
(ii) arranged to deposit all child support payments into a checking account belonging to the obligee, or made arrangements insuring that a reliable and independent record of the date and place of child support payments will be maintained; or
(iii) arranged for electronic transfer of funds on a regular basis to meet court-ordered child support obligations.
(3) In cases where the court or administrative body that entered the order finds a demonstration of good cause or enters a written agreement that immediate income withholding is not required, in accordance with this section, any party may subsequently pursue income withholding on the earliest of the following dates:
(a) the date payment of child support becomes delinquent;
(b) the date the obligor requests;
(c) the date the obligee requests if a written agreement under Subsection (1)(b) exists; or
(d) the date the court or administrative body so modifies that order.
(4) The court shall include in every child support order issued or modified on or after January 1, 1994, a provision that the income of an obligor is subject to income withholding in accordance with this chapter; however, if for any reason that provision is not included in the child support order, the obligor's income is nevertheless subject to income withholding.
(5) (a) In any action to establish or modify a child support order after July 1, 1997, the court, upon request by the obligee or obligor, shall commence immediate income withholding by ordering the clerk of the court or the requesting party to:
(i) mail written notice to the payor at the payor's last-known address that contains the
information required by Section 62A-11-506; and
(ii) mail a copy of the written notice sent to the payor under Subsection (5)(a)(i) and a copy of the support order to the office.
(b) If neither the obligee nor obligor requests commencement of income withholding under Subsection (5)(a), the court shall include in the order to establish or modify child support a provision that the obligor or obligee may commence income withholding by:
(i) applying for IV-D services with the office; or
(ii) filing an ex parte motion with a district court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to Section 62A-11-504.
(c) A payor who receives written notice under Subsection (5)(a)(i) shall comply with the requirements of Section 62A-11-507.